Whenever I hear about progressive Christianity and its implications on believers today, I can't help but think of the book, Why We're Not Emergent (By Two Guys Who Should Be) by Kevin DeYoung and Ted Kluck, published 16 years ago.
Even though this book is older, it still addresses foundational concerns with this overall movement. Although I can see why some Christians are grappling with better understanding their faith, I have definite concerns about the theological fidelity of this religious movement, which is not new and just sounds like a fancier version of what was considered emergent Christianity a few years ago. If the fruit of emergent Christianity is now the deconstruction of Christian faith, it should not be a surprise.
It's not that I don't think questioning or even doubting should occur in the Christian faith. It's more that the line of questioning with the emergent Christian movement seems to be without end, purpose, or meaning. It comes across as asking questions for the sake of asking questions. I realize this is a broad generalization that may not apply to all those who have been seeking, but the question needs to be asked: what are you ultimately seeking? The God who is or the God you want Him to be? After reading this book, I realized that I do not want a God who can be so easily formed by human opinions and conclusions. God has freely given us the ability to know Him and He is not so unknowable that we can never answer any questions about Him, and I want to know who that God is.
This book addresses theological concerns, but also the practical outcomes of emergent thought. Readers will appreciate the dual perspectives offered and the broad range of topics discussed, including doctrine, modernism, dialogue, and community. The last chapter on "Why I Don't Want a Cool Pastor" still resonates with me today, solidifying the continual need for biblical teaching within our churches.
Comments
Post a Comment