Skip to main content

Aughts or Not

various cassette tapes lined up in a 4x5 grid against white background

This title of this post came to me one day while I was thinking about when I first started reading Christian books. To be honest, I hadn't realized that the first decade of the millennium was called the aughts until much more recently. In my mind, I kept calling it the 2000s, but I can see how that has more syllables and may be a mouthful. It's hard to believe that a few decades have passed since I first came to faith in Jesus Christ and subsequently, read almost everything I could get my hands on (I'm thankful that God provided some discernment in my early Christian years despite my voraciousness!). As a result, the content of books from the late 90s and early 00s is vastly different than content today. For nostalgia's sake, I sometimes read older novels or books to recapture memories before life became highly technological.

I recently saw a meme that shared how the millennial generation should be renamed the Spice Girl generation. Apparently, "Members of the Spice Girls generation are the only people in history to have both grown up with the internet and to retain childhood memories that predate it" (Caity Weaver). While I'm a tad bit older than the birth years provided, I can relate to having an analog life and a digital life. Although I first used a computer in the late 1980s at school, it was not a common household fixture until the mid-1990s, and even then, that was a privilege for families who could afford it. I remember my parents scrimping and saving in order to furnish me with a desktop computer, which I've never had the heart to throw away and which still technically works. The one thing we did get rid of is something that I miss to this day—a blue (now considered vintage) typewriter that I wrote all of my stories on in elementary school. When I progressed to an electric typewriter a little later on, it felt like such a time-saver! Being in the first graduating class that allowed students to write provincial exams on the computer instead of pen and paper seems like it was a great leap at the time. Now I think of how people can do so many things with just a smartphone, and it truly is mind-boggling at times.

When reading books from the aughts or earlier, these are a few of the differences from contemporary or non-fiction books written today that I have noticed:

  • I remember what it was like to not have instantaneous contact with people. People could only be reached by landline, and later, pagers (though I don't recall knowing anyone who had one), and much later, cell phones. Nowadays, people can be reached anywhere and anytime, which should eliminate miscommunication themes in books. In non-Christian books, screen time was more limited to the issue of televisions. If only they could see us now.
  • Delivery existed for pizza, but few other culinary options. When I read about people getting all sorts of deliveries now, it's pretty amazing how widespread that is. I can recall books where a plot device would be having to go to a physical location for something. More recent books I've read have included the notion of getting deliveries at midnight, getting something shipped in the same day or the day after, or being on a device and ordering something that you hadn't realized was possible (like convenience store items!).
  • The availability of information at our fingertips is astounding. A lot of older books would talk about the steps involved in researching something, a task not easily embarked on. Going to libraries or referencing encyclopedias doesn't seem like that long ago; now with voice assistants, people don't even have to move their hands!
  • The role of social media is an obvious change, but it makes me think of the impact on relationships as well. Social circles were more limited when there was no online reach. Who you knew was who you knew in your community, school, work, church, etc. At the same time, while the quantity of relationships has increased, more attention is now being paid to loneliness. I'm sure a lot of studies have been conducted on the connection between social media and the quality of relationships now, but it was certainly a different era where a social life was manifest in-person (or maybe through long-distance calls and letter writing). Related to these is mental health, where it seems like this new digital world would have been one less stressor in people's lives.
  • The nature of work and the types of job functions has expanded considerably. Back then, a lot of non-fiction books documented well-known professional roles, such as teachers, nurses, tradespeople, etc. With a lot of new information age-based work now, it's a bit more difficult to explain these positions, along with the opportunities and challenges that have come from practices such as working from home, remote work for a multi-national company, or side gigs. In novels, there's been a shift toward people having more flexible work so that there is time for a story to develop 😄
  • The prevalence of travel and transportation options. I still remember booking trips in college through a travel agent (and these weren't for packages or luxurious travel either—just plain basic airfare). Now that it's much more common to book travel tickets on our devices, it feels like travel is much more accessible, though maybe not less-costly. It seems like it's no longer a big deal for a character in a book to go places, whereas in older books, there was a little bit more work involved in having to procure train or bus tickets, for example. With non-fiction books, I remember that travel was usually discussed in the context of people travelling for work such as salespeople, or maybe the one family trip that had been planned for ages.
I'm pretty sure that I could go down a rabbit hole comparing books from the aughts (and before) versus now. I admit that I'm sometimes amused by things I read in Christian books that are outdated now, but that it's also a pleasant reflection back on a time that I remember fondly. I've seen a few books set in the 1970s and 1980s and am waiting for subsequent decades to become trendy for fiction. As for non-fiction, well, I'm sure there are updated editions being released that no longer reference fax machines (I actually used one at work up until five years ago!), rotary phones, floppy disks, and video rental stores. While I enjoy watching videos of the past, I am also grateful that I no longer have to compete for time on dial-up Internet, making me glad that I can relive the aughts without actually having to relive them again 🖳

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Breath of the Almighty

I've had the pleasure of revisiting my love of poetry through reading poignant and touching collections of Christian poetry that I've been introduced to on Instagram. I'm grateful that Breath of the Almighty by Shay McNally came at just the right time for me, tugging on my heart and my mind through verses that point back to God in every breath and poem. Many thanks to the author for providing a complimentary copy of this book for review consideration. All opinions are my own. Content to be aware of : SA Book Synopsis Breath of the Almighty is a debut collection of free verse, confessional Christian poetry born from a life that's seen both deep wounds and deeper mercy. These poems move through topics such as family, grief, soul searching, healing, love, marriage, calling, spiritual warfare, prayer, forgiveness, and the ordinary places where Christ shows up when we least expect it. Each poem is rooted in Scripture and lived-in faith, and grounds lofty theology to an eve...

Theological Backgrounds

Have you ever wondered about the theological background of authors? I am sometimes curious, especially if there are things that pop up in their books that make me pay attention (either positively or negatively). What I've found is that it's not always easy to find out. Some authors will openly share what church or denomination they belong to, whereas others don't seem to mention it—which for privacy concerns, I completely understand. In terms of how important this information may be for readers, or not at all for some, it does make me think about the role that this could play when deciding which books to read and buy. On the one hand, I think not specifically knowing which theological stream an author comes from but still being aware that they fall within the broader evangelical umbrella is fine with me. There's so much to learn as believers and I wouldn't want to be limited to only simply what I know. On the other hand, not knowing much beyond "Christian"...

Reader Observations

In reading a fair amount of fiction, I've noticed certain commonalities (and quandaries) over the years. Although I'm writing more about fiction than non-fiction so far on this blog, it seems to be easier to find similarities in stories than in teachings, though I'm sure I could put some thought into repeated non-fiction concepts. A few things that I have observed in reading fiction that either puzzle me or amuse me are the following (please be assured that none of this is meant to be scathing but rather something to poke fun at): The concept of grey (or even purple) eye colour. I can't recall meeting someone who hasn't had brown, blue, green, or maybe hazel eyes. Hazel to me is a mix of the above colours, and as I'm not terribly well-versed in further distinctions, I wonder if I'm missing a whole subsection of the population with these aforementioned eye colours. Recessive genes being dominantly featured. Surely there are more brunettes and brown-eyed peopl...